 |
 |
"... beyond healthy controversy lies darker and
more dubious ground."
Gilbert Grosvenor, National Geographic Society, 1990 |
 |
 |
 |
|
The ocean depth soundings made by Peary were ignored by critics who
had no idea what that data meant. Only in modern times has it been
shown to prove that Peary mapped the ocean floor to the Pole. |
 |
|
|
 |
|
"These were legendary men who had a
worthy goal - to be the first to reach an axis of the earth; to stand on
top of the world. " |
|
 |
The myth that Peary may have missed the North Pole by up to 30-60
miles West is a recent one (Wally
Herbert's book, 1988) that may be approaching "urban legend status". In the
last 15 years a certain segment of the public have begun to believe it is
true without any substantial proof. There is
abundant evidence supporting Peary's achievement, and no legitimate evidence
refuting it. Every fact agrees that
Peary did reach the North Pole, exactly
as he had stated, within the limits of accuracy of his sextant.

Peary's 1909 achievement was neither doubted by the press nor the
public despite Frederick Cook's claim to have reached the Pole before Peary.
While Cook was quickly exposed as a fraud, Peary's success was constantly
accepted.

The roots of this contemporary controversy can be directly traced to Cook's vindictive book, My Attainment of the
Pole, written with encouragement from his supporters in 1911. Cook joined the
Chautauqua lecture circuit for many years (1912–1918)
to promote this book
while publishing additional editions totaling 60,000 copies. These were sold
as he traveled from city to city. Many copies were simply given to the press.

By
1917 a Cook supporter, Thomas Hall, published a similar anti-Peary work Has the North
Pole Been Discovered? Cook also had a congressman lobbying on his
behalf. These events became the basis of all subsequent
literature claiming Peary was a fraud. After Cook's death in 1940 his
descendents perpetuated what became a family vendetta to discredit Peary.

Cook's grand daughter, Janet Vetters, was a tireless
troublemaker who hounded 80 year old members of Peary's expedition to make
statements supportive of Cook. None would oblige her. Vetters' correspondence,
now preserved in archives, shows that she encouraged numerous
writers to publish books or magazine articles supporting Cook. She was able
to inspire a TV movie starring Richard Chamberlain as an innocent Fred Cook
cheated out of his North Pole achievement by Peary. This created a series of
events leading to Wally Herbert's publication (1988) of the
worst anti-Peary work ever written; Noose of Laurels.

From Vetter's
will in 1989 was born the $1,000,000.00 tax-exempt, trust-funded Frederick A. Cook
Society. This not for profit corporation pays for
endless pro-Cook propaganda
to writers, the media, and all major encyclopedias. They
provided materials, for example, that assisted Robert Bryce to produce his
1100 page biography of
Cook (1997) that claimed to prove Peary never reached the Pole. Instead
it only proved Cook was a criminal fraud. Only 5 pages were devoted to
Peary.

Referring to Peary critics in 1990 the National Geographic Society's (NGS)
Gilbert Grosvenor had written "... beyond healthy controversy
lies darker and more dubious ground." In an effort to fairly
resolve this matter the Society commissioned the
Navigation Foundation to examine all evidence of Peary's North Pole
expedition.

Their report was published in a book and also as an article
that appeared in the January, 1990 NGS Magazine
titled New Evidence Places Peary at the Pole by
Thomas D. Davies, Rear Admiral USN (Ret.) Admiral Davies' son Douglas
assisted with research for this and for the book length Navigation Foundation Report.
After Admiral Davies death, his son Doug's involvement
led to a permanent interest in this area.
Doug now enjoys a collection of all the major books on this subject in
addition to the celestial navigation instruments, including a mercury
artificial horizon, and Waltham watches like Peary used. He has the same
model Kodak camera Peary used in 1909. With this Davies has refined the accuracy
of photogrammetric tests used to determine Peary's 1909 latitude.

Davies is the only writer on this subject
who can explain with reliable authority how each Peary critic went wrong.
An attorney by profession, he brings a highly educated and disciplined intellect to
this subject; an expert understanding of the scientific and
mathematical aspects of this subject coupled with extensive factual
knowledge of Peary's expeditions. Doug's examinations of the classic Peary
myths are not simply a matter of his opinion, but rather of demonstrable
fact that will satisfy any intelligent person.

Davies forensic historical re-examination redeems our
historical past while providing and enlightening journey that applies brilliance
to a murky area that had virtually
swallowed up a heroic team comprised of a Naval officer, his black
assistant, 4 loyal Inuit guides, and their ship load of team mates; legendary men who had a
worthy goal— to be the first to reach an axis of the earth and stand on
top of the world. To their immense credit they did indeed accomplish it. Yet
only after 90 years of ignorant criticism
can we confirm it scientifically,
with even greater certainty, if that is possible, than it was affirmed
nearly 100 years ago.

So next time you here someone say Peary didn't reach
the Pole, keep in mind that you are listening to propaganda generated by a
90 year old vendetta. It is a lie, but one that has a $1,000,000 trust fund
dedicated to perpetuating it. You may also realize that the fact that Peary
took a Negro has a lot to do with this. So why did Peary take Henson? Let
Commander Donald B. MacMillan, a team member, tell you in his own words.

| (From actual newspaper clipping; spelling is left as in
original) |

"The rest of us were tenderfeet compared with the Negro, Matt
Henson...Henson is probably the best dog driver in the world to-day.
He could talk the Eskimo language like a native. He could get along better
with the natives than any of us; the Eskimos all liked him. He was the only
man in the party who could build a snow house. He made every sledge and
every cookstove used on the route to the Pole. Henson was altogether the
most efficient man with Peary. By Marvin and Bartlett's observations he was
only 120 miles from the Pole when they left him and he was stocked with food
enough to go fifty miles beyond it. Peary, Henson and the four Eskimos said
they travelled five long marches after we left them, sufficient to reach the
Pole and then go ten miles further."
END
Rusty Robinson, April, 2002 |